Received an installation.created hook with no installation key
#201228
Replies: 6 comments 2 replies
-
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I just experienced the same thing for installation_repositories.added event: https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks/webhook-events-and-payloads#installation_repositories |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
We received several |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Welp, it's still ongoing. Delivery ID |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It's totally a GitHub bug, and that field is mandatory. It happens when a backend glitch malforms the payload right before it fires, sometimes caused by edge cases like a suspended account installing the app. Also, as you have the delivery ID, open a ticket with GitHub Support so they can dig into their logs. For now, just add a quick if check to drop or log payloads missing that key so it doesn't crash your server. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
API
Body
Hey, something very odd happened today - we received a webhook with delivery ID
3b5e1970-7a24-11f1-880d-d28d47102517, topicinstallation, actioncreated, but the body does not include theinstallationfield at all (not undefined, not null, simply not present). This field according to the docs is required, and our system relies on it being present.Am I missing something here or is this a bug?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions